Editorial Standards

Our editorial purpose

Keersa Health exists to help readers make sense of health technologies, devices, and protocols. We aim to identify what is measured, what is inferred, what research supports, what remains uncertain, and what a reader should verify before acting or purchasing.

Evidence and sources

When evaluating a topic, we may consider:

• peer-reviewed research, systematic reviews, professional guidance, and regulatory material;
• manufacturer documentation, specifications, manuals, pricing, and support policies;
• the practical burden of setup, adherence, maintenance, subscriptions, and replacement;
• measurement validity, study population, endpoints, limitations, and conflicts of interest; and
• our own editorial interpretation of the product category and its tradeoffs.

Sources are selected for relevance and usefulness, not merely quantity. A citation does not mean that a study proves every manufacturer claim or that results apply to every person or product.

How we evaluate devices

Device coverage may weigh signal quality, intended use, safety limitations, product class, ownership cost, recurring fees, interoperability, usability, support, and whether the device answers a meaningful question. Criteria vary by category because a sleep tracker, sauna, compression system, and force plate do not perform the same job.

Rankings, labels, scores, and recommendations are editorial tools. They reflect our personal views and independent judgment, not laboratory certification, clinical endorsement, or a guarantee of individual results.

Independence and affiliate relationships

Some product links may generate a commission. Affiliate availability does not decide which products we cover or how we evaluate them. We may recommend products without affiliate programs, criticize products that offer commissions, and decline to recommend products when the evidence or value proposition is unconvincing.

Medical boundaries

We provide general educational content, not diagnosis, treatment, or individualized medical advice. Articles should identify important safety limits and situations where professional guidance is appropriate, but they cannot account for a reader's complete medical history. See our Medical Disclaimer.

Updates and product changes

Evidence, prices, subscriptions, software, product availability, and regulatory status change. We display update information on articles and revise material when practical, but we cannot guarantee that every specification or price is current at the moment you read it. Readers should confirm purchase-critical details with the manufacturer or retailer.

Corrections

We aim to correct material factual errors clearly and promptly. Minor spelling, formatting, or clarity edits may be made without a correction note. Material changes to a conclusion, product specification, safety statement, or cited fact should be reflected in the updated article.

To report a possible error, use our contact form and include the article URL, the statement in question, and a reliable supporting source where possible.

Editorial accountability

We welcome specific, evidence-based feedback. Commercial pressure, free-product offers, or disagreement with an unfavorable conclusion do not by themselves justify changing an evaluation. When our interpretation is opinion rather than settled fact, we aim to say so.